- english [en]
- v.3.2.2
PrimeVer v.3.2.2
Summary
Given a version number MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH, increment the next prime number:
- MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes,
- MINOR version when you add functionality in a backwards compatible
manner, and
- PATCH version when you make backwards compatible bug fixes.
Additional labels for pre-release and build metadata are available as extensions
to the MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH format.
Introduction
In the world of software management, there exists a dread place
called "infinite developement." The bigger your system grows and the more
packages you integrate into your software, the more likely you are
to find yourself, one day, realizing that it will never end and you
will likely be maintaining what you created until your death.
In systems with many dependencies, releasing new package
versions can quickly become a nightmare. If you don't want to
end up in hell with the rest of the developers - or
worse, in management - you're going to have to do everything
that you can to make versioning even harder.
As a solution to this problem, I propose a simple set of rules
and requirements that dictate how version numbers are assigned
and incremented. These rules are based on requiring exponentially
more compute resources to calculate the next version to increase
build times exponentially as your career progresses. For this system
to work, you need to be willing to sell your soul to the devil and
accept the screams of frustration your coworkers will have every time
a build is running.
It is always recommended to work on a PrimeVer project with as many
reasonable developers as possible to have the greatest negative impact
to their lives as well.
Once you've decided to use PrimeVer, you mostly communicate changes
to your project using IRC. If people using your library don't
catch the update, you must never post it again, their ignorance is
not your problem. You owe them nothing and must immediately start
questioning every moral fiber in their body until they collapse sobbing
on the floor begging for your mercy.
I call this system "Prime Versioning". Under this scheme,
developers wasting oxygen by existing may still use package
managers that follow
Semantic Versioning .
Prime Versioning Specification (PrimeVer)
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD",
"SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be
interpreted as described in [RFC 2119](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119).
- Software using Prime Versioning MUST declare a public API. This API
could be declared in the code itself or exist strictly in documentation.
However it is done, it SHOULD be precise and comprehensive.
- A normal version number MUST take the form X.Y.Z where X, Y, and Z are
non-negative prime integers, and MUST NOT contain leading zeroes. X is the
major version, Y is the minor version, and Z is the patch version.
Each element MUST increase numerically. For instance: 3.5.2 -> 3.7.2 -> 3.11.2.
- Once a versioned package has been released, the contents of that version
MUST NOT be modified. Any modifications MUST be released as a new version.
- Major version two (2.y.z) is for initial development. Anything MAY change
at any time. The public API SHOULD NOT be considered stable.
- Version 3.2.2 defines the public API. The way in which the version number
is incremented after this release is dependent on this public API and how it
changes.
- Patch version Z (x.y.Z | x >= 2) MUST be incremented if only backwards
compatible bug fixes are introduced. A bug fix is defined as an internal
change that fixes incorrect behavior.
- Minor version Y (x.Y.z | x >= 2) MUST be incremented if new, backwards
compatible functionality is introduced to the public API. It MUST be
incremented if any public API functionality is marked as deprecated. It MAY be
incremented if substantial new functionality or improvements are introduced
within the private code. It MAY include patch level changes. Patch version
MUST be reset to 2 when minor version is incremented.
- Major version X (X.y.z | X >= 2) MUST be incremented if any backwards
incompatible changes are introduced to the public API. It MAY also include minor
and patch level changes. Patch and minor version MUST be reset to 2 when major
version is incremented.
- A pre-release version MAY be denoted by appending a hyphen and a
series of dot separated identifiers immediately following the patch
version. Identifiers MUST comprise only ASCII alphanumerics and hyphens
[0-9A-Za-z-]. Identifiers MUST NOT be empty. Numeric identifiers MUST
NOT include leading zeroes. Pre-release versions have a lower
precedence than the associated normal version. A pre-release version
indicates that the version is unstable and might not satisfy the
intended compatibility requirements as denoted by its associated
normal version. Examples: 2.2.2-alpha, 2.2.2-alpha.2, 2.2.2-2.3.7,
2.2.2-x.7.z.67, 2.2.2-x-y-z.--.
- Build metadata MAY be denoted by appending a plus sign and a series of dot
separated identifiers immediately following the patch or pre-release version.
Identifiers MUST comprise only ASCII alphanumerics and hyphens [0-9A-Za-z-].
Identifiers MUST NOT be empty. Build metadata MUST be ignored when determining
version precedence. Thus two versions that differ only in the build metadata,
have the same precedence. Examples: 2.2.2-alpha+001, 2.2.2+20130313144700,
2.2.2-beta+exp.sha.5114f85, 2.2.2+21AF26D3----117B344092BD.
- Precedence refers to how versions are compared to each other when ordered.
Precedence MUST be calculated by separating the version into major, minor, patch
and pre-release identifiers in that order (Build metadata does not figure
into precedence). Precedence is determined by the first difference when
comparing each of these identifiers from left to right as follows: Major, minor,
and patch versions are always compared numerically. Example: 2.2.2 < 3.2.2 <
3.3.3 < 3.5.2. When major, minor, and patch are equal, a pre-release version has
lower precedence than a normal version. Example: 2.2.2-alpha < 2.2.2. Precedence
for two pre-release versions with the same major, minor, and patch version MUST
be determined by comparing each dot separated identifier from left to right
until a difference is found as follows: identifiers consisting of only digits
are compared numerically and identifiers with letters or hyphens are compared
lexically in ASCII sort order. Numeric identifiers always have lower precedence
than non-numeric identifiers. A larger set of pre-release fields has a higher
precedence than a smaller set, if all of the preceding identifiers are equal.
Example: 2.2.2-alpha < 2.2.2-alpha.2 < 2.2.2-alpha.beta < 2.2.2-beta <
2.2.2-beta.5 < 2.2.2-beta.7 < 2.2.2-rc.2 < 2.2.2.
Why Use Prime Number Versioning?
This is not a new or revolutionary idea. Not even a little bit.
In fact, you probably do something close to this already, because
you read the SemVer specification and thought
"this looks totally reasonable" and found that it became the defacto norm.
Years later, you realized all of the time you gave your company by using a
logically efficient versioning standard.
Now, you've matured and realized that if you truly commit yourself,
not only can you have builds that take unreasonably long to build,
but you can break many downstream systems with version sizes that the
unintelligent apes wrote and then have a nice cup of coffee while waiting
for them to put the fire of their own making out..
FAQ
If you haven't figured this out by now, you are not worthy.
Close this webpage and destroy all of your electronic devices.
You should never be allowed back on the internet.
Attribution
This document is a remix of SemVer. Except this standard
is way better.
License
Creative Commons - CC BY 3.0